I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle:
I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle has recently gone viral on social media (Instagram, WhatsApp, Twitter and Facebook) for quite some time now, in the midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Check out the I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle here in our website.
You can also find the explanation to the I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle in this article.
Read more to know about the tricky Riddle explanation and Challenge your family and friends.
For what reason would it be a good and useful idea for one to solve the I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle & understand the trick on it ?
These days people have become super active with family and friends through the different social media platforms, etc. People are playing quizzes and solving puzzles, and riddles amid the COVID-19 pandemic to learn and make their minds active and to improve their thinking ability & creativity & to keep busy while having fun…
riddles, Puzzles, and challenges have become viral as people try different and fun ways to connect with each other. Such tricky & intelligence & IQ riddles are currently trending on social media. Apart from sharing updates related to the Coronavirus, several people are challenging their friends and loved ones for various WhatsApp puzzles and riddles.
Recently, people have been sharing I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle with their friends and family. I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle has become the latest online buzz. Hope your are curious to know the I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle explanation . The clear answer of I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle along with the full explanation is given below. Take a look at the I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle.
You can also check out other interesting riddles and quizzes (Math Riddles, Kids Riddles, Funny Riddles , Words Riddles, Logic Riddles, Who Am I Riddles…) from the suggestions given below.
I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle with Answer
Amid Covid-19, I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle is trending and many people are excited to solve the I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle. So we have explained the I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle here and Hope it will be challenging too. Let’s see the answer for I Enter the Bedroom There is 34 Riddle here.
Here is I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle
I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle goes as follows:
“You enter a bedroom. There are 34 people. You kill 30. How many are in the bedroom?”
What is the answer to I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle?
The right answer to I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle is “5”.
This indeed is a bit tricky as most of common answers that were shared are 4,but that’s not the correct answer.
If we read the riddle it asks ‘how many are in the bedroom’.The total number of people is 34 and 30 were killed. Hence,
34 – 30 = 4. So the answer would be 4.
But as I said thats not the correct answer.
The tricky part is you should add yourself when you enter the room. When you add yourself, that makes 35 people. So, if you kill 30 people, that leaves you with 5 people, including yourself.
35 – 30 = 5
Therefore, the correct answer is “5”
Hence, this particular riddle is to test your Accuracy of observation and your calculative & math skills. Hope you enjoyed solving I Enter the Bedroom There are 34 Riddle. If you like to solve tricky and interesting riddles like this visit our website WWW.FB505.COM .
This is not poorly written. You must consider the chronological order of the statements.
“You enter the room” Presumption is 1 person
“There are 34 people” Given that this is a subsequent statement, the presumption is that “you” are now part of this number. This presumption also leads to the notion that the killer is also in the room (which is likely the only misleading statement) So the total is still 34.
“30 are killed. How many people are in the room?”
30 people being killed is a moot point because the question does not suggest living vs dead as a factor.
So the answer is 34. As a friend of a friend asked “I kill 30….but like sniper style?….” That is the only uncertainty in this entire hypothesis. Again, presumption is key to the acceptable answer. It’s not an assumption….presumption meaning presumed in absence of further information”.
There would be 35 people in the room. It does not matter the amount of people you killed, the number of people in the room does not change, and since you stepped in the room that would make it a total of 35 people in the room.
Do you count yourself as part of 34?
Did the others run away?
If you answer yes to the second question, 1
If you answer yes to first question but no to second, 4
If you answer no to both, 5
The answer is 1. Beacuse only I enter in the bedroom its not specify that there were 34 people in the bedroom…..maybe the could be outside the bedroom.
Ok you mentioned HOW many people are in the room, so I will assume the dead ones are included cuzz they are humans . Including you, 35. But like they are still dead people, in other words corpses. So I presume 5, excluding you 4.
2 answers eh
First I will kill those 30 people.
Second I would also kill the remaining 4 people so they won’t go to the police.
Then there’s only 1 person in the room which is me!
Answer: 1 Person
When you enter, are you part of the 34? I guess not. In which case, there are thirty five people in the room; of course, I’m assuming you can be called a person after killing so many people.
5 people, the 4 remaining and yourself.
4 if you no longer consider the murderer a person.
1 if the survivors are actually smart enough to flee, (0 if the 2nd statement is also true or you flee as well)
5 that are still alive. Unless the four you didn’t kill are your friends, you better finish the job. What was going on in that bedroom? 34 people!
Now Big bedroom to be able to fit all those people in it, But did that 34 include your self or not other wise?. there is still either 34 or 35 some are dead but if you want alive one only then 4 or 5 if don’t include yourself in the 34
I don’t know how many people are in the room. you said there are 34 people but you dint mention where there are. you also say that you kill 30 but 30 what? birds, fish, rats etc
A good question to show the dangers of making unjustified assumptions. People may make the following incorrect assumptions.
Assumption 1: the 34 people are in the garden. Not proven.
Assumption 2: The 30 people killed were in the garden. Not Proven.
Assumption 3: ‘You’ was in the garden. Not Proven.
Assumption 4: No one has left or entered the garden. Not Proven.
Assumption 5: dead people don’t count. Only live ones.
Too many people will assume “I enter the garden where there are already 34 people including you. You now kill 30 of the people in the garden. Assuming no one has left, how many live people are left in the garden?” That is NOT the question asked.
This is very simple to understand. The question is very ambiguous. Lets go through this succinctly:
We are told in a 3rd person perspective we are entering a garden that contains 34 individuals,
Next, we are to kill 30 people.
Some would initially say there’s only four people left alive in the garden but this isn’t right.
The correct answer is 5 people – the 4 left from the people who were to be killed and the individual responsible for killing these people, not 4 as some would assume is the final answer.
Just remember, this is a good critical thinking question to give someone in terms of thinking outside the box.
Solution 1: 35, as you simply added yourself and everyone else is still in the garden
Solution 2: Only you, as the survivors ran off and the dead people no longer count as people because they’re dead
Solution 3: The 4 survivors run away, there are 30 dead people and they count, plus you, that’s 31
30 Dead but still in the room.
1 plus yourself.
There is 1 person in the bedroom. The statement You enter a bedroom should be the focus. Irrelevant to the following sentences.Only becoming relevant again when the question is asked how many people are in the bedroom.
It isn’t mentioned that there are 34 people ‘in the bedroom’. It says you kill 30, but the. Question arising here is who 30?
Basically, You are the only person entering the Bedroom and the question asked is how many people are in the room. So answer is 1
Can you present any arguments or evidence – or at least define your terms – in support of your assertion that solving a trivial word puzzle indicates higher than average critical thinking skills?
“If you get this you are a critical thinker.”
Perhaps, but what a critical thinker gets from this is “there is no clear answer”.
If you think the One Correct Answer is 1, 4, 5, 34, 35, etc., you have fallen into a logical trap and aren’t a very good critical thinker.
this is my logic:
so, 34 people in a room. i enter which makes it 35. i kill 30 people, so there are 5 people left including me. now, those 4 people aren’t just gonna stand there. they’re obviously gonna run out of the room because they witnessed ppl getting slaughtered lmaoo. which leaves me and a bunch of dead bodies, so 31 haha.
So far you’ve only mention me being in the room. You didn’t say where the 34 people were (could be outside the window). My answer is one person.
The answer is 1. None of the information states that the 34 people and 30 kills were in the bedroom, therefore, that is extraneous information. Rather, the only information we are given is that you entered the bedroom, meaning that, from what we know (not from what we could assume) you are the only person in the bedroom making the answer 1.
The awnser is 5 OR 35 depending upon definitions: 5 would be me and the four survivors. There would also be 30 human remains in the room. These are no longer people because they are no longer alive. A person (plural people or persons) is defined as a being that has certain capacities or attributes such as reason, morality, consciousness or self-consciousness. Alternately the awnser is 35 if you add up me, four surviving people and 30 dead people. Choose your definition to get the final answer. Class dismissed.
1, that is you, as I (you) entered your bedroom as you posted I (you) entered the bedroom, rest 34 people in or any room anywhere, even if you (I) that is me as you say if I kill any that is 30 or any makes no difference as you are 1, in your bedroom, hope I am rite.
So the final answer is : 1
Step 1: I entered a room
Step 2: There are 34 (must include me, this info is given after I entered)
Step 3: I can assume they didn’t escape since I am at the entrance wielding a weapon of doom. So the three remaining survivors and 30 corpses are also in the room. They are still people. Or at least not disqualified from peoplehood as I see it
“There are 34 people”. It doesn’t say where they are, yet nearly everyone here is assuming that they are in the bedroom!
My answer is 1.
Because, based solely on the information given, and ignoring “possibilities” because of the ambiguities, the only person known to be in “the room” (i.e. the bedroom), is me, because the question clearly states “you enter a bedroom”.
The answer is 1. Based on known facts.
All else is speculation.
There is one answer. The answer is 34. You go with what information is given.
I enter the bedroom.
At this point there are now 34 people. This includes I and You.
You kill 30 people.
There are still 34 people in the room. 30 are dead. Room doesn’t have to be bedroom here. It is still ‘the room’ you entered originally.
That’s the answer. For any other answer you need to stretch logic beyond its breaking point. It’s not a clever question. It’s simple.
Since there are 34 people after you enter the bedroom, the total number of people before you entered the room was 33 only. If you killed 30 people who are now just dead bodies only so let’s not call them people anymore. Now only 4 people are left including you.
If you count dead bodies too as people then 34 including you are still there. I’ll prefer not to count dead bodies as people so just 4 people including you are left in the bedroom. 👍
My best critical thinking answer is as below.
First of all, keep each sentence is seperate and don’t relate or continue with other sentence.
Chance #1 .You enter a bedroom – Question is How many people are in the room (it should be bedroom) – then the answer is one (yourself).
it doesn’t link with the other two sentences (critical thinking) – Just like the news or question to other guy ..doesn’t mean “you” “me” who reads the sentence. the question can be anyone to anyone. or statement to anyone to anyone..
My answer is one ,who is there in the room (bedroom).
The only exact answer is there is no exact answer.
it simply can be any number.
It doesn’t say 34 people are in the bedroom you entered. It could be any bedrooms.
It doesn’t say which 30 people you killed. You could shoot through the window or put a bomb somewhere which exploded when you entered the bedroom.
People could leave or enter the bedroom while shooting.
The final word is “room” and not “bedroom”. It can be any room at any time.
It can also be that you had a nightmare and then you woke up. Still, you could sleep with your wife or none, or whatever.
Anyway, there is no exact answer however you put it.
There are different ways of looking at this.
Answer #1. 35 if you are not one of the 34. 30 dead people, 4 living, plus you.
Answer #2. 34 if you are one of the 34. Same reasoning as #1
Answer #3. 30 dead people plus you (assuming you did commit suicide). The other 4 (or 5 depending on how you count) got the heck out of dodge and are no longer in the room
Answer #4. Same logic as #3, but you are among the dead, so 30 dead people in the room.
Answer #5. 4 or 5 depending how you counted the original 34, and not counting the dead.
I could go on.
One way of killing 30people in a room without those 30 killing you is maybe by gaseous weapon or grenade, with those you are likely to get killed. But if with knife, riffle or short gun, before you kill 30, you are definitely maimed or killed. However, if you end up killing 30 without being killed, the remaining 4 would have ran 1000mph. Laughs. But for Riddle’s sake, if I kill 30 people out of 34. I still have 34 people because killing them doesn’t make them turn animals. They are still 34 people in the room. Smiles
The sequence of the four statements don’t create a relationship between all of them. To solve this, match statements that follow a sequence creating a relationship. Specifically, find a match to the actual question. In this case, “You enter a bedroom”, then, “How many people are in the bedroom?” Because the first statement and the question are the only to sequences that can possibly be matched and that make sense within a context. So, the answer is one. Only me. Myself!
You enter a bedroom. There are 34 people. You kill 30. How many people are in the room?
There were 33 people in the room prior to your entry. Once you entered the room there were then 34 people in the room. This is assuming that those people are in the room you entered.
If we are counting living people only, there are now 4 living people and 30 corpses remaining in the room. If we are counting both living and dead, there are still 34 people in the room, assuming you are still there. Once you leave, there would be three living and 30 dead, this is assuming you did not commit suicide and are among the dead.
If those 34 people were not in the room you entered, then there is only one person in that room.
If you get this you are a critical thinker. You enter a bedroom. There are 34 people. You kill 30. How many people are in the room?
At least one, since you entered the room. There is not enough information specified precisely to assume more.
The question doesn’t specify that the 34 people are in the room, or that the 30 people you kill are in the room—you could very well be shooting 30 out of 34 people visible out the window.
If we allow imprecision we might make the following assumptions:
The 34 people are in that room
The 30 people you kill are also in the room
Corpses don’t count as people
In that case, there are presumably either four people in the room (34 people including you) or five people (34 people excluding you).
These questions frustrate me. I walk into a room with 34 people and I kill 30. My first question is WHY WOULD I DO THAT? That’s insane. My next question is WHY NOT THE OTHER FOUR? I’d have to assume they ran like hell, so they are no longer in the room, which is why I didn’t kill them. So how many people are in the room? Do you count dead people as people? But what if one of the people I kill is me? And not 4, but 5 people ran like hell. Now there are 30 dead people in the room (counting me) and zero living people. But if I’m dead, answering this question is the least of my problems. Then there is the prologue “If you are a critical thinker.” What if someone’s name was “30” or as you go around counting the people you kill “30”. Yeah my brain continues to ramble so there’s not enough information here. And why are 34 people in a bedroom for crying out loud?
The answer is 34. There are of course many, many ways to answer this but I will go with there are 34 people in the room. Broken down as follows:
33 Alive (32 original bedroom people + you).
The statement says “You enter a bedroom. There are 34 people. You kill 30.” It did not say there were 34 other people in the room, just that “You enter a bedroom.” Then it states “There are 34 people.” That means there were 33 people before you entered and now there are 34. It did not say that you killed 30 people, just that “You kill 30.” Which to me means you killed the 30th person in the room, not 30 people. It also does not ask how many are left alive, just how many people are in the room. Since it does not state that anyone left you would still have 34 people in the room
This is a very annoying question, as it does not provide enough details to figure out the answer, regardless of whether you are a critical thinker or a freaking genius.
So, assuming that murdered bodies are still being referred to as people (rather than corpses), and, again, assuming that you-the killer, are still in the room, than there are 31 people in the room.
However, I am assuming (yet again) that in this case corpses are no longer being counted as people, so if there were 34 people in the bedroom and 30 got killed, the remaining 4 ran like hell, so there is only 1 person left in the room, you-the killer, looking around the room admiring your handy work.
Although, I have to add, that unless those people severely betrayed you & destroyed your life, gang raped you, killed your family or pets, and it was a revenge killing, because you couldn’t get justice any other way, than there’s something’s majorly wrong with you and I sure hope your saved last bullet for yourself!
Much love 🖤
According to IMDb, there are 21 people in Tommy Wiseau’s 2003 film The Room.
Jokes aside, the answer you’re obviously looking for here would be 5 people, (34–30)+yourself, right?
No wait… the 30 dead people are still there? Does that mean there is 35?
This scenario (or, as the more conceited would say, thought experiment) begs the philosophical question, what makes a person a person?
Aristotle, among many others, suggests that the living human is made up of matter and soul. From his teachings, many have understood that without a soul, you cannot be considered a human.
In addition, Descartes’s famous concept “I think, therefore I am” leaves the question: If you can’t think (eg. dead) do you continue to be human?
And do you really have to be human to be a “person?”
The answer here lies within your definitions of what you consider a person and who you do not, and to what philosophical theories you consider most accurate.
While many other answers here have made a huge deal of nitpicking various points of grammar in the question, in my opinion, the most important part of critical thinking is being able to tell what a question is really asking, and being able to make educated assumptions as to what is being required of you. This yields much more interesting and accurate answers to such problems, rather than making low blows that are not relevant to solving a problem.
The order of the statements should matter. The order implies that, upon entering, you become the 34th person. Colloquially, we could interpret these sentences to mean that you enter a room containing 34 people to become person number 35. For the sake of pure logic, I will assume the former: you enter to become person number 34.
The next statement says you kill 30 people. Did you kill people in the room, outside the room, or some combination of the two? We don’t know. Perhaps, you kill 30 people remotely and no one in the room even knows it.
If the people you kill are in the room, it is logical to assume you are planning to kill everyone, then possibly yourself. The 3 survivors subdue you, kill you, or flee. That leaves 4 people, 3 people, or 1 person (you), respectively. It is also possible 3 survivors kill you and flee at the same time. This outcome yields 0 people in the room.
If the people you kill are outside the room, then we need more information. It is possible that all 34 people (including you) remain in the room after you kill 30 people. It is conceivable that you killed 30 people from a great distance using some sort of device and no one in the room even knows it.
No logical connection exists between the people in the room and the people you kill. The context implies a connection that is not stated outright.
“You enter a bedroom. There are 34 people.”
I’m going to go very into detail here. You said that there are 34 people, but not where they are. So this says that there are 34 people in the multiverse.
“You kill 30.”
To kill the 30, I have to either leave the room if they are not in the room, or not leave the room if they are in the room. Or maybe I can leave the room if I feel like it.
You said that there were 34 people in the room after I entered, so there is anywhere from 0–34 people. Even if I kill them, they are still people, and maybe still in the room.
Answer #2: (same final answer as answer 1, but I have lots of free time.)
“You kill 30.”
30 could be a person, an animal, or a plant. (In a multiverse with only 34 humans, 30 could be a legal human name) And again, they are inside or outside the room, and since if they are possibly not a person, they can be inside or outside the room. So if they are inside, 0–34 people in the room. If they are outside, still 0–34 people.
Answer #3: (Again, the same answer)
“How many people are in the room?”
The room. You didn’t say the bedroom. The bedroom could’ve been inside another room, or the room could’ve been inside the bedroom.
Either way, the answer is 0–34.
Very simple there are four people left in the room. Technically there were 35 people in the room when you walked in the room. The minute you open fire or however you dispatched 30 people you stop being a human being in my humble opinion so whether you killed yourself or not there are still four people left and you that would make five people if I considered you a human being. Legally you’re still a human being so I guess the lawyer would consider it five people one of which is probably going to need services and will generate income. There is a little bit of information missing you could’ve shot through a window or some such thing at people outside the room we change the equation. Hopefully whoever was left in the room would be able to rush you and club you to submission before you reloaded. 30 dead bodies would not seem to be people to me they would be corpses. Also depending on how much time had elapsed when would assume that eventually the room would be cleared of all people including the shooter of the empty room would be covered in yellow police tape in which case there would be nobody in the room for the foreseeable future until the crime scene was investigate. Also there are a slight ambiguity in the question is that 34 people before you enter the room or after you entered the room. If you enter the bedroom and you were shooting people in the living room for example 30 that would change the situation as well. So technically my answer would be between four and five people depending on how much we want to argue over words. If you’re actually thinking about this please call your local police department and turn yourself in immediately.
My critical critical thinking leads me to believe that a person who asked the question like this doesn’t care very much about people and is looking for relevant answer to relevant questions.
Well, you didn’t specify what or who I was going to kill in the sentence, ‘You kill 30.’. If I assume you were referring to the people in the room, there are still many uncertainties. It is unclear what category of ‘person’ is included in the final count (living or dead), so if we’re counting dead people then there are still 34 left in the room. That is, of course, assuming they weren’t moved either during the process of them being killed or after they were killed. Perhaps I entered the bedroom, took those I was going to kill out of the bedroom and killed them outside. In this scenario, there are 4 people left in the room – of course, that also assumes both that I only moved those I was going to kill and that there were only 34 people and no more in the room. You said that there were 34 people in the bedroom, which could simply be part of a greater number of people. Also, it is unclear when the recording of the number of people in the room is taking place. The number could differ depending on this variable, since you didn’t specify at what point in the scenario I measure the number of people in the room. So, in conclusion, no matter whether or not you include dead people in the count and no matter whether or not I assume that I am killing the referred-to people, you cannot be sure how many ‘people’ are in the room. Some could have been moved at some point, those 34 people could be a smaller portion of more people in the room and the 30 that I killed could be part of a larger number of people I killed. However, if the time when I am measuring the number of people in the room is the same as the time when there were 34 people in the room, then there are definitely 34 people in the room (which can still be part of a larger number). However, your parameters for deciding whether someone is inside or outside the room must be the same as those used that originally determined that there were 34 people in the room at that time.
P.S. Sorry if this makes no sense, my ramblings often don’t to other people. Anyway, this was a fun little brain exercise even if it only evoked nonsense out of me.
34-30=4+1 (self) Total left in the room =5
The answer is 1. It says that only you enter the bedroom. it was never stated that the 34 people was inside the bedroom.
It’s 1 u enter a bedroom basically You are the only one in that bedroom for the rest it doesn’t tell u were they are it’s just to make it more confusing
5 you entering the bedroom made it 35 and I must of already been in the room so I don’t add myself so after killing 30 there are 5 left you me and 3 others. Unless you count dead people in which is still 35 just 30 are dead.
If you decide there are 34 or 35 people, at the end of this question, there will STILL be 34 or 35 people. Yes, thirty will be dead, but they’re still people.
Right answer is 1 because question is saying u enter in bedroom…nd nothing clarifies regarding 34 peopl e and 30 killed people
Looking at it strictly from a riddle point of view, the answer would probably be 1. Since it’s written that only I had entered the bedroom and not mentioned where the 34 people were or where they had been killed.
It says- You enter a bedroom. It doesnt say there are others in the bedroom they can be in other rooms The Question is how many are in the bedroom well based on the wording of this riddle the answer is 1.
There is no use of dead or alive.
So including the killer there are total of 35 people (dead+alive) left in the room
I don’t know why people are typing such huge answers with probability and everything. It’s a simple logic based question. It was never said in the question that 34 people are in the bedroom. So the only person that is known to have entered the bedroom is you. So the answer is 1.
The answer is supposed to be 35 but that is wrong. It doesn’t say there were 34 people in the room and then you entered making 35. It says you enter a room and then in says there are 34 room you enterpeople. Since you are already in the room when they say there are 34 people, 34 is actually correct. If it said you enter a room that has 34 people in it, then maybe you could aay you add yourself. If it said there are 34 people in a room, you enter, then you need to add yourself. But it says you enter a room. There are 34 people. So you are already counted.
You need to break down the question i am entering a bedroom. This is saying that 1 person(I) entered the room
There are 34 people, the riddle is not specifying that the 34 people are in the same bedroom that I entered,
You kill 30 people, again this is not specifying where you killed those 30 people
So therefore the last question is how many people are in the bedroom, this is going back to asking about the bedroom that “I” entered, in wich case there is only one “I” am the only one in the bedroom
I know the answer for this puzzle is supposed to be 35…But I disagree because of the way this puzzle is stated…the answer should be 34.
It doesn’t say “you enter a room OF 34 people”, or “you enter a room that HAS 34 people.” The puzzle clearly says “you enter a room” first. THEN after that sentence it says there are 34 people in the room. So that 34 people would include you. The fact that you killed 30 people does not change the fact they are still in the room. 😉
I think there is no exact right or wrong because the question is not clear in terms of ‘classifier of what you killed and ‘definition of people’.
If 34 people is in the same bedroom as ‘you’, 34+1= 35 people. There will be 35 people in the bedroom.
‘You’ kill 30 but there is NO classifier so ‘you’ may kill ants, flies or even people.
If ‘you’ kill 30 people, there will be 5 alive people (34+1-30=5) + 30 dead people. Either alive or dead ones, we can still call ‘people’.
or you may say 5 alive people + 30 corpses/dead bodies.
Choose any answer you like. LOL
You enter a bedroom.
There are 34 people.
You kill 30.
How many are in the bedroom?
You are not in the same room as the 34 people. you are in the bedroom. The riddle puts “There are 34 people. You kill 30.” in the middle to make the answer hide in plain sight.
The problem is not stated correctly. It does not specify whether or not I am included in the group of 34 people. So we can have two good answers. If I count myself as part of the 34 people, the answer is 34. If I do not count myself as part of the group of 34 people, the answer is 35.
1.- I enter a room. That is one person. There are 34 people (we assume inside the room). That makes 35 (assuming I am not part of the group of 34). I kill 30. There are still 35 people inside that room (assuming none of the survivors escape). Me, 30 dead people and four people alive = 35 or
2.- I enter a room. There are 34 people counting me. I kill 30. There are still 34 people inside that room (assuming none of the survivors escape). 30 dead people and four alive (counting me) = 34
the only conclusive evidence of any people in the room is the first statement, you enter a bedroom, so there is one person in it, so far we know. The answer could be just one. The next statement mentions there are 34 people which could mean they are anywhere but we would assume that these statements are all related and have a thread that runs through them but maybe not. The other version I have seen states in the first line ”I” enter a bedroom, not “you” I think the trick here is that “I” enters the bedroom and “you” kills 30 people. Suggesting “I” and “you” are not the same person and the two scenarios ,(the bedroom) and the (murder of 30 people) are not related. In this version however “You” enter the room and “you” also commit the murders , but at a stretch they also could be unrelated scenarios as far as location is concerned. There is no evidence to suggest you kill people in the same bedroom that you are in, maybe you blew them up with a bomb or shot them out the window, who knows. The answer is still probably meant to be only one. (person in the bedroom)
If this were a math equation, then you would do 34 minus 30 to get 4.
So the answer would be 4.
Buuuut, if you do this is terms of a riddle, then it would be different.
The answer would be 5.
Well, There are 34 people in the room whenever you enter. But whenever you add yourself, that makes 35 people. So, if you kill 30, that leaves you with 5 people, including yourself.
But wait! There’s more! *dramatic noises*
There could be another solution to this also. (In terms of a riddle, of course)So, the riddle states, “You enter a room and there are 34 people.” So, that could mean that you are one of the 34 people in the room. It doesn’t specify wether you and 34 others are in the room, or if you are included with the group. So, technically, the answer could also still be 4, if you include yourself in the 34 people in the room.
Sorry this post is so long 😂 (I tend to overthink things a lot)
Edit: Thanks for the other solutions and things in the comments! This is just what I thought it would be. I realize there are other possible answers, but this is just one I could think of.
Based on the fact that there is not enough information given for clarification, there is more than one viable answer. The internet puzzle solvers say 35 – this assumes the 34 are actually in the bedroom and does not include the “you” who entered, and when “you” entered, you became number 35. This is the total including dead and alive people.
However, I posit that the “you” who entered the bedroom left 34 people in the living room (or kitchen or sunroom or dining room), turned around and killed 30, leaving the total in the bedroom as one, just “you”.
But it could also be 34. “You” entered the bedroom. There are 34 people and since “you” entered already, “you” were number 34.
The puzzle does not specify dead people do not count, ergo, we have to assume they still count as people. I could still spin this but as I said at the outset, this quandary does not provide enough info for a solid correct answer. So top 3 answers (in no particular order) are: 1, 34, or 35. Prove me wrong.
You entered a room of 34 people. A shooter then enters killing 30. What is the probability of people that are left in the room?
I assume that what you meant is either what is the probability of you surviving or what is the number of people still alive in the room.
Both of them start off like this: you enter the room, which had 34 people in it. Now, there are 35 people in it. Then, the shooter enters, making the total number of people 36.
In the latter assumption, all we need to do is subtract 30 from 36, leaving 6 people.
However, in the former assumption, there are one of two possibilities:
A) The shooter shoots at everyone in the room but not at themselves, killing whomever he hits. In this case, the odds of you surviving, due to you not being the shooter, is 5 in 35 – as of the 35 people in the room before the shooter enters, 30 of them would be killed – which simplifies to 1 in 7, or about 14.3%
B) The shooter has a chance of killing themselves in the shootout. In this case, it would make more sense if the shooter, if they did kill themselves, did so last. In which case, you have a 6 in 35 chance of not being killed as one of the first 29 people killed, and then a 6 in 7 chance of surviving the last kill assuming that you survived the first 29. In this case, the chances of survival would become 36 in 245, or about 14.7%
B2) But let’s say that somehow if the shooter kills themselves early, that doesn’t stop the others from being killed after him. In this case, the chance of survival is 6 in 36, which simplifies to 1 in 6, or about 16.7%